2013年9月30日星期一

AMD introduces A-series APUs

AMD introduces A-series APUs, promises to challenge the whole Sandy Bridge lineup

After upsetting the Atom domination with ultra-portables and netbooks with its E-series, APUs AMD has set its sight on the more powerful portable computers. The company has just unveiled its new A-series of CPU-plus-GPU chips.

The A-series includes a couple of dual-core processors and five quad-core offerings. The two lowest sitting members are the 1.9 GHz A4-3300M and the 2.1 GHz A4-3310MX, which both support dynamic turbo boosting of up to 2.5Ghz and have 2MB of L2 cache. The Radeon HD 6480G with a clock speed of 444 MHz is the GPU of choice for both A4 chips.

The quad-core A6-3400M and A6-3400MX come next in the pecking order with 4MB of cache each. Their nominal operating frequency is 1.4 GHz and 1.6 GHz respectively and they both reach 2.3 GHz in boost mode. A Radeon HD 6520G clocked at 400 MHz takes care of the graphics here.

The A8 sub-series consists of the A8-3510M, A8-3510MX and A8-3530MX APUs. Radeon HD 6620G running at 444 MHz is their GPU of choice, while the available L2 cache is 1MB per core. The 3510M runs at 1.5 GHz, while the 3510MX and 3530MX reach 1.8 GHz and 1.9 GHz respectively. In Turbo mode there’s less to separate those three with the max speeds being 2.4 GHz for the 3510M, 2.5 GHz for the 3510MX and 2.6 GHz for the 3530 MX.

The A-series members with names ending in M have a TDP of 35W, while those named MX need up to 45W.

Starting at $499 for the A4, $599 for A6, and $699 for A8, those new chips will certainly be greatly appreciated by manufacturers of mainstream laptops.

In fact HP already showed its support for the lineup by saying that it will be adding the APU’s to 11 (that’s eleven) of the laptops in its portfolio. Those include six members of the Pavilion family (dv4, dv6, dv7, g4, g6, g7) and five ProBooks (6465b, 6465b,4535s, 4435s and 4436s). Scheduled to arrive in late June and July those laptops will start from a sweetly sounding $519.

Sources: AMD, HP

Chrome's popularity on Android grows

Chrome's popularity on Android grows, iOS users show it no love

Google has such a huge presence on the web that it was only logical for it to make its own browser – and Chrome was born. Recently, Chrome has been expanding its reach to mobile territory but growth has been slowed by its requirements – unlike the stock Android browser, Chrome runs only on Android 4.0 and above (and 2.3 Gingerbread still holds over half the market).

According to Net Marketshare‘s numbers, Chrome is the browser of choice on 4.03% of Android devices. Those Nexus devices that come with Chrome only probably helped push the numbers up.

Chrome is available on iOS too though it’s a cut down version that uses Apple’s HTML and JavaScript engine and not its own. Which would explain why it barely made a made mark, having a 0.01% usage share in November. When all platforms are taken into account (both phones and tablets), mobile Chrome has 1.14% market share.

That’s not much but it’s more than BlackBerry’s browser managed (1.09%) and Opera Mini has been on a relatively steady decline (it currently sits at 7.02%), so it’s only a matter of time before it and Chrome meet. Internet Explorer is somewhere in the “Other” group in Net Marketshare‘s numbers.

The stock browsers of the two big platforms – iOS and Android – naturally see the most use. Mobile Safari is the undisputed leader with 61.5% (it started the year at 54.85% and peaked in August at 66.43%) with the Android Browser a distant second at 26.09% (it was 17.78% in January and has been growing ever since).

Source | Via

2013年9月29日星期日

Acer Aspire 3951 images and specs leak

Acer Aspire 3951 images and specs leak, an ultrabook that takes aim at the MacBook Air

Intel has been talking about its ultrabooks for a while and now some leaked specs of an Acer-made ultrabook show what they could be like. The Acer Aspire 3951 (catchy name) is a 13.3″ laptop with aluminum body that is just 13mm thick and weighs about 1.4kg.

I’d love to see some official specs on the Aspire 3951 but for now we’ll just have to look at the rumors – a second-generation Intel Core processor (that’s Sandy Bridge) and optional SSD sure sound good. If the 160GB SSD is too small for you, there are 250GB and 500GB HDD options too.

The Acer Aspire 3951 also reportedly features goodies like an HDMI port and Bluetooth 4.0 (that enables low-power Bluetooth accessories). The battery of the Acer ultrabook should last for 6 hours on one charge, which is pretty impressive too.

There’s no info on graphics but the integrated Intel graphics are probably what we’ll get. Fitting dedicated GPUs in super thin laptops usually drives the price up quite a bit, not to mention that it often causes heat issues.

The Acer Aspire 3951 will reportedly ship in November for $770-$960 (€540-€670), depending on configuration. That should give the new 13″ MacBook Airs a run for their money – they start at $1,300 (with a 128GB SSD).

Acer doesn’t quite have Apple’s reputation, but that price gap should make everyone on the lookout for a similar device at least consider it. Are you interested?

Source (in Vietnamese)

Ad-supported Fruit Ninja now available for free in Android Market

Ad-supported Fruit Ninja now available for free in Android Market

If you have an Android-based smartphone and don’t like to pay for games, here is some good news for you. Halfbrick Studios has just launched an ad-supported version of Fruit Ninja and you can get it for free from the Android Market right now.

The game was launched back in March in the Amazon’s app store for free, then hit the Android Market for $1.29.

Well, you can have it for free right now. If you don’t mind having some ads around and want to slice some fruit, the game is waiting for you in the Android Market.

Source

2013年9月28日星期六

Nokia looks for Top 5 social superstars

Nokia looks for Top 5 social superstars, will give them $10,000 and 21 Nokia C7s to throw a party

Nokia is offering to help you throw an outrageous party – they’ll provide you with a $10,000 dollar budget and 21 Nokia C7 phones and you must provide enough votes from your friends to put you in the Top 5…

So, here’s what you have to do – you sign up to participate here and try to get as many votes from your friends as you can by January 3rd. To win, you have to place in the Top 5 (by number of votes).

Better hurry though – the person in 5th place on the leader board (hit “Click to expand” to see it) has over 2800 votes already.

If you are in the Top 5 come January 3, Nokia will give you $10,000 to throw a party – and one Nokia C7 to keep for yourself and 20 more to hand out at the party. Better start thinking of fun contests to determine who wins a phone – with so many votes and such budget, it will be one huge party.

Source

720p video capture plus a pocket projector – that’s 3M Shoot-N-Share

720p video capture plus a pocket projector – that’s 3M Shoot-N-Share

3M Shoot-N-Share is a nice pocket gadget capable of capturing 720p videos. But its most important feature is the integrated pico projector for showing your works directly on the wall.


3M Shoot-N-Share projects only in VGA resolution, but I guess it’s the best we can get from a pocket technology. It also has microSD card slot and HDMI port to watch your videos in full resolution on a proper big screen.


3M Shoot’N Share

I doubt any of today’s camera/projector duo packed in whatever tech (phone, player, etc.) can become a bestseller, but I believe there’s hope for the future ones.

3M Shoot’N Share will launch in October for 300 US dollars.

Source

HTC One X battery test concludes

HTC One X battery test concludes, the results are inside

So here we are at the end of the HTC One X battery test and we are ready to share the results with you. If you wonder how efficient that Tegra 3 4-PLUS-1 architecture is and whether the companion core makes up for the four power-hungry ones, here is the place to find out.

The HTC One X bright 4.7″ HD LCD is certainly hard to feed, but you can’t blame the huge 1800 mAh power pack for lack of trying.

As usual, we started with the talk time test, which saw the One X deliver its best performance of the whole test. With the screen staying off the whole test, the large battery mattered big time and helped the One X survive for nearly 10 hours on a single charge.


Talk time

  • Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
    20:24
  • Samsung Galaxy Note
    12:14
  • Samsung Wave 3 S8600
    11:07
  • HTC One V
    10:00
  • HTC One X
    9:57
  • HTC One S
    9:42
  • Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
    9:40
  • HTC Sensation XL
    9:30
  • Nokia Lumia 710
    9:05
  • HTC Vivid
    9:02
  • HTC Rhyme
    8:48
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
    8:41
  • Meizu MX
    8:39
  • Samsung Galaxy S II
    8:35
  • Nokia Lumia 800
    8:25
  • Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    8:23
  • Samsung Captivate Glide
    8:20
  • HTC Rezound (LTE)
    8:10
  • Samsung Galaxy Note (LTE)
    8:02
  • Apple iPhone 4S
    7:41
  • Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
    7:14
  • Samsung i937 Focus S
    7:25
  • Samsung Rugby Smart I847
    7:09
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
    6:57
  • Nokia N9
    6:57
  • HTC Radar
    6:53
  • BlackBerry Curve 9380
    6:52
  • Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T (LTE)
    5:53
  • LG Nitro HD (LTE)
    5:16
  • HTC Titan II (LTE)
    5:10
  • BlackBerry Bold 9790
    5:00
  • Pantech Burst
    4:46

Sadly, the web browsing performance wasn’t so inspiring and the One X fully charged battery went flat merely 4 hours and 18 minutes after the start of the test. The high resolution really makes browsing a joy, but it comes at a price.

Web browsing

  • Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
    7:23
  • HTC Radar
    7:17
  • Apple iPhone 4S
    6:56
  • HTC One V
    6:49
  • BlackBerry Curve 9380
    6:40
  • Samsung i937 Focus S
    6:15
  • Samsung Rugby Smart I847
    5:53
  • Pantech Burst
    5:51
  • Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
    5:45
  • Samsung Wave 3 S8600
    5:34
  • Samsung Captivate Glide
    5:33
  • Samsung Galaxy Note LTE
    5:24
  • HTC Sensation XL
    5:20
  • HTC Rezound
    5:16
  • HTC Rhyme
    5:08
  • Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
    5:07
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
    4:50
  • HTC Vivid
    4:46
  • Meizu MX
    4:35
  • Nokia N9
    4:33
  • Samsung Galaxy S II
    4:24
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
    4:20
  • HTC One X
    4:18
  • Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T
    4:10
  • Nokia Lumia 800
    4:07
  • HTC Titan II
    4:05
  • HTC One S
    4:03
  • BlackBerry Bold 9790
    4:02
  • LG Nitro HD
    4:00
  • Nokia Lumia 710
    3:51
  • Samsung Galaxy Note
    3:35
  • Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    3:01

The HTC One X put up a more respectable performance in the third test – SD video playback. With the companion core proving more than enough for the task, the smartphone took 5 hours 45 minutes to lose 90% of its charge.

Video playback

  • Motorola DROID RAZR MAXX
    14:17
  • Samsung Rugby Smart I847
    9:34
  • HTC One S
    9:28
  • Apple iPhone 4S
    9:24
  • Nokia N9
    8:40
  • Samsung Galaxy Note
    8:25
  • Samsung Galaxy S II
    8:00
  • Samsung i937 Focus S
    7:55
  • Samsung Wave 3 S8600
    7:52
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia neo V
    7:45
  • Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G 7:33
  • Samsung Galaxy Note LTE
    7:30
  • Samsung I9103 Galaxy R
    6:21
  • HTC Sensation XL
    6:12
  • Samsung Captivate Glide
    6:04
  • Samsung Galaxy Nexus
    6:02
  • HTC Vivid
    6:00
  • HTC Radar
    5:54
  • Nokia Lumia 800
    5:52
  • HTC Titan II
    5:50
  • BlackBerry Bold 9790
    5:47
  • HTC One X
    5:45
  • Sony Ericsson Xperia Pro
    5:44
  • Pantech Burst
    5:38
  • Meizu MX
    5:27
  • HTC Rhyme
    5:23
  • HTC One V
    5:20
  • Nokia Lumia 900 for AT&T
    5:18
  • BlackBerry Curve 9380
    5:09
  • HTC Rezound
    5:03
  • LG Nitro HD
    4:17
  • Nokia Lumia 710
    3:27

We came to the final and most important result in our test. The HTC One X got an endurance rating of 37h, which suggests you will only need to charge it once every 37 hours if you use it for an hour of each of the three activities per day.

While 37h isn’t the highest rating we have seen, it’s more than an acceptable score, given the screen size and the resolution of the One X. We guess anyone who doubted the battery life of the Tegra 3-packing smartphones and the efficiency of their quad-core processors should now breath a sight of relief.

You can find more about the test itself here.